jump to navigation

The Hangover (2009) July 29, 2009

Posted by Dragan Antulov in Film Reviews.
Tags: , , , , ,
trackback

A Film Review

Copyright Dragan Antulov 2009

In these increasingly cynical and nihilistic times it is refreshing to see Hollywood film that doesn’t try to sell illusion, or at least provides content that resembles real life. Inspired by allegedly real life events, THE HANGOVER, 2009 comedy by Todd Phillips, tells a simple but believable tale about events that most of the audience, in one way or another, can relate to.

The plot of the film begins with Doug Billings (played by Justina Bartha) going to bachelor party in Las Vegas, accompanied by two of his best friends – schoolteacher Phil Wenneck (played by Bradley Cooper) and dentist Stu Price (played by Ed Helms) – and his future brother-in-law Alan Garner (played by Zach Galifianakis).  Four men plan to have good time in Sin City, but their plans are apparently executed too well when they wake up next morning in a completely trashed hotel room with a live tiger and crying baby. To make things even worse, there  are only three of them – Doug is nowhere to be seen. Doug’s friends, who don’t remember what happened, now have to find him and during their quest they not only have to face consequences of their depravity but also enter into various unpleasant and dangerous situations.

THE HANGOVER proved to be very successful comedy at the box-office, but it wasn’t particularly funny. The script Todd Phillips co-wrote with Jon Lucas and Scott Moore had couple of good scenes, but most of them were average at best. Characters were cliched, especially in case of Stu whose relationship with over-controlling girlfriend (played by Rachael Harris) meets rather predicatble end. Character of Alan, on the other hand, is perhaps too odd for the general tone of the film; it appears that scriptwriters flirted with idea of describing him as pedophile only to balk fearing viewers’ backlash.

What makes THE HANGOVER watchable is the story,  because it features ordinary (at least, in most cases) people in extraordinary, yet quite believable situation. It is hard to find a person who didn’t do something stupid and regrettable in their lives and audience can empathise with characters faced with consequences. THE HANGOVER works not because it is a comedy, but because its unimpressive comedic content is framed by much more interesting detective story. Film becomes even more intriguing by approaching much darker genre territory. Those viewers who watched VERY BAD THINGS – another film about Vegas vacation going terribly wrong – can feel suspense because filmmakers until the very end leave all options open about Doug’s ultimate fate. This flirting with darkness, if done with little more bravery, could have resulted in much better film. However, despite some missed opportunities and thanks to Phillips’ good direction and good acting, THE HANGOVER deserves recommendation as a film that would provide much better time to audience than to its protagonists.

RATING: 6/10

Comments»

1. easty - January 24, 2010

A Community Message

How to save yourself an hour and half of your precious time

Last night, not being particularly interested in watching the 20 over BIG BASH, I downloaded and watched from Foxtel Box Office a movie called “Hangover”, promoted as an uproarious, slapstick, in your face comedy that will have you rolling in the aisles.

Lets cut to chase – I find it hard to remember ever watching a worse movie. There are no laughs, the acting, which was average, was replete with a cameo appearance by Mike Tyson who was more wooden than a good old American Oak Tree. Stick to your day job Mike! As for the storyline – well give me Flying High anytime, at least FH doesn’t pretend events in their movie could actually happen.

The movie is also a bit scary, dangerous even. It is about four guys who go to Vegas on a bucks outing and wake up all with a “Hangover”. But not a hangover in the traditional sense but one bought on by all being slipped the “date rape” drug Rohypnol. You see one of the four blokes, in an effort to spice up the night, goes to a local drug dealer and buys some ecstasy but instead is given Rohypnol which he then passes on to his mates and takes himself.

Now I may be living in fantasy land but I don’t think a comedy based on what four blokes do under the influence of Rohypnol is all that funny. Particularly given the number of women who have been killed and raped after having this drug slipped into their drinks.

What this movie is saying to viewers, especially younger viewers, is that “roofies” (street slang for Rohypnol and used repeatedly throughout the movie) are fun and that very funny things can happen if you take roofies – Ha ha ha I don’t think.

Enough moralising – the movie is just plain stupid, unfunny, has a ridiculous story line, no subtlety at all, is poorly acted, has sloppy editing and sends out all the wrong messages.

That the movie has taken $300 million USD says a lot more about society that it does about the movie in my view.

But here is the good news – flushed with success a sequel is planned and starts shooting in October (I think I know what they should shoot).

So there I have saved you THREE hours.

Easty


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 110 other followers

%d bloggers like this: